Social Security a Ponzi Scheme? Then how come National debt- borrows from it, US President Donald Trump and Mr. Elon Musk?
Mr. Elon Musk, is in charge for assessing Federal Services, this has been indicated by US President Donald Trump and Mr. Elon Musk reflects the same through his tweets and posts, for analysis of its content will indicate only a person in charge can make those allegations he made and give orders to staff at Federal Services. Even when Mr. Musk is informed on Social Security details yet he indicated the Social Security is like a Ponzi Scheme. Then my question to US President Donald Trump and Mr. Musk is that how come the US government through its national debt as part intragovernmental debt owes Social Security more than 2 trillion dollars?
a)
Ponzi
Scheme?
According to data available online for December
2023, the 34 trillion dollars of National debt of United States can be broken
down to 27 trillion (79%) debts held by Public, here Public includes investors
outside Federal Government, they are individuals, corporations, the Federal
Reserve, foreign State and local governments. The remaining 7 trillion (21
percent) was held by intergovernmental debt, which is transfer from one part of
government to another, the largest holder of intragovernmental debt is the
Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, which holds $2.6
Trillion or 38 percent of intra governmental debt. Other accounts holding such
debt include retirement funds for federal employees, Medicare Hospital
Insurance Trust Fund and the Highway Trust Fund.
The breakup of national debt under intragovernmental debt are: Social
Security Old age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund $ 2,641; Federal Employee
Retirement Fund $1,053; Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund $209 billion; Medicare
Supplement Medical Insurance Trust Fund 187; Social Security Disability
Insurance Trust Fund $147; Highway Trust Fund $113; Federal Housing
Administration $78; Deposit Insurance Trust Fund $24; Other $2,892. If the
national debt included money borrowed from all these headings, how can Federal
Services be such a Fraud or Social Security just a Ponzi Scheme.
What was the idea of false claims of fraud
detection, for D.O.G.E actions and plans indicated there is no substance in the
scale of accusation. Neither US President Donald Trump nor Mr. Elon Musk are naive
enough to consider that creating chaos, discontinuing jobs especially those who
can give qualitative input for assessment is the way to carry out evaluation/assessment.
Hence their actions indicate the goal was to use fear, power and
unconstitutional claim that US Presidents has free hand both administratively
and legally to define his power, its limit and capacity to curtail powers of
other structures of governance; there by dismantling different aspects of
Federal services and filling professionals and public with so much fear that
they stop thinking and taking action. Was the gamble, the chaos and disbursed
staff would give a gap to push in tech-based governance with the idea that
private tech agencies would manage governance in a more professional way and
greater use of AI would cut fraud and reduce resources needed which in turn
would create surplus or saving and reduce deficit.
My curiosity is what would happen to all the
debts the American government owes the various funds or agencies within the
heading intragovernmental debt; would it have converted to initial seed money
for tech-based agencies to digitize the Federal Services and Create AI systems
of Governance?
Have the perception, am being unfair not
really, look at how experts talk about debt reduction, they state debts are
caused by predictable structural factors: the aging baby-boom generation,
rising health care costs, higher interest rates, and a tax system that does not
bring in enough money to pay for what the government has promised its citizens.
Why is that it seems all the options are with regard to holding the general
population and not the industries or the elite accountable? Why is tax the only
option to hold the industries and elite accountable and when they go into loss,
they have option to declare bankruptcy and get away from any accountability.
Countries take many measures to support
industries, provide subsidies on land, energy, infrastructure, construction of
communications systems be it road or cyber options. During initial stages seed
money is given as loan or grant with pride and hope but with hardly any
accountability. The question is why no accountability at least after these
ventures become a success. Why are elite and industries subsidized eternally or
taxes are collected and given back to corporate itself. Shouldn’t the
subsidizes on resources provided by society be systematically reduced. This
will become relevant issue when Artificial Intelligence and Robotics will play
a greater and thereby reduce need for human agent or work force drastically.
President of United States and Mr. Elon Musk
think about fraud beyond Federal Services and working class, fraud by the
industries and corporation be it through free ride with resources, with
increased use of AI the energy need would be far more than what is slated for
at present, the increased scope for slave like ecosystems evolving with workers
and family living under surveillance of corporation it would be worse than what
happened earlier, the lack of accountability to environmental damage caused and
society having to foot the bill, the growing use of crypto currency and for
enclosed eco-systems of industrialists they may evolve their own crypto
currency on which society has no control or accountability. Take the example of
TrumpCoin (TRUMP) while its value has crashed but US. President Donald Trump
has only made profit, for probably these coins are way to unaccounted wealth
including scope for laundering money and even Anti-Money Laundering Act 2020
would have limited impact. Isn’t there a serious need to look at fraud from the
angle of industries, corporations and elite. Till date no country has looked at
the percentage of country deficit that arises from industries or corporation
fraud and lack of accountability.
b)
Diversity,
Equity and Inclusiveness
US President Mr. Donald Trump and Mr. Elon Musk
have not lost any opportunity to poke fun at the concept and indicate it is
some how responsible for national debt. Here diversity refers to differences in
identity, perspective, skill and style. Equity focuses on ensuring fair and just
practices and policies that address systemic inequalities and provide
individuals with resources and opportunities they need to succeed. Inclusion
creates an environment where everyone feels welcomed, respected and valued, and
where their contributions are actively sought and utilized. While this
framework is often used within organizations, for it to be relevant there is
need for it to be a way of life. This approach evolved as way to address
discrimination based on identity or disability.
If the term DEI is unacceptable to President
Donald Trump and Mr. Elon Musk, then why the interest and support for Neuralink
Corp. For the focus is to create inclusiveness for quadriplegics and give scope
for them to feel a sense of independence and connectivity with the world. The
question is why spending of resources for Neuralink Corp initiatives is fine
and government approval granted at the same time both President Donald Trump
and Mr. Elon Musk has such negative attitude towards the concept of DEI and
other forms of disability and or relevant initiatives for empowerment. There is
a contradiction.
Is it possible that interest in addressing
issues of quadriplegics is not out of desire for inclusivity or concern about
diversity but rather it is part of experimentation to get raw data on direct
interaction between machine and human intelligence. An exploration that would
benefit creation of gadgets to augment human capacity and skills. Just a
question.
So, distant are the billionaires from every day
reality of life, that after destroying lives of ordinary people, calling them
fraudulent after decades in service, abrupt snatching of their survival means; the
billionaires express surprise at expression of negativism or anger. Mr. Elon
Musk you are calling a person who can get Medicaid only if is his income is
below $15,060 a fraud among other thing, the amount which might be less than
spare change for you and the US President. US President Donald Trump should
also know that as the cut off is income below $15,060 to be eligible for
Medicaid, the person may have to work at rate below the legal minimum wages per
hour in United States.
This is what US President means when he says
“Make America Great Again”.
Mr. Elon Musk “Winners take it all?”.
Molly Charles
Comments
Post a Comment