Skip to main content

D.O.G.E or apt alternate full form Drive over Government Efficiently, is it a Terror Agency?

 

Assessment work of any agency has never caught the national and international headline as the terror agency D.O.G.E of Elon Musk, who has no skills in carrying out assessment or evaluation of any agency let alone US Federal Services. He has proved it making a mockery of the process, firing people even before initiating an assessment. In any other country, there would have been mental restraining order against both Elon Musk and the delusional US President Donald Trump.

 It is pathetic to see American ethos fall so low that even a failed state may seem to have some decorum left when considering certain instances that are happening. D.O.G.E is a terror agency, for it is carrying out acts that are criminal and unconstitutional, the President of United States does not have the sanction to transfer a criminal act into a legit one.

According to the Department of Justice, as per even the Patriot Act: Preserving life and liberty, the USA Patriot Act: Preserving Life and Liberty (Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism), this act was passed 98-1 by Senate and 357-66 in the House with support from members across the political spectrum.

a) Even under this there are provision made for detecting, arresting or seizing property within agencies. The Act allows law enforcement to use surveillance against more crime of terror, but the process need to indicate the care taken to get evidence or data on crime committed or suspected to be committed. The Act enabled investigators to gather information on terrorism related activities and terrorism financing. But evidence is needed before action is taken.

b) The Act allows federal agents to follow sophisticated terrorists trained to evade detection… the Act authorized agents to seek court permission to use same techniques in national security investigation to track terrorists. But the Court Permission is needed to follow terrorist.

c) The Act allows law enforcement to conduct investigations without tipping off terrorists. In certain cases, if criminals are tipped off too early to an investigation, they might flee, destroy evidence, intimidate or kill witnesses, cut off contact with associates, or take action to evade arrest. Therefore, federal courts in narrow circumstances have allowed law enforcement to delay for a limited time when the subject is told that a judicially-approved search warrant has been executed. Notice is always provided, but the reasonable delay gives law enforcement time to identity the criminal associates, eliminate immediate threats to our communities, and coordinate arrests of multiple individuals without tipping them off beforehand. These delayed notification search warrants have been used …

But there is need for legal notification and search warrant.

d) The Act allows Federal agents to ask a court for an order to obtain business records in national security terrorism cases. Examining business records often provides the key that investigators are looking for to solve wide range of crimes. Business records and other items are got through grand jury subpoenas, but in national security cases the same process is not appropriate and so under the present Act, the government can ask federal court (the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court) to get access to the records but the federal court issues the order only after the government demonstrates “the records concerned are sought for an authorized investigation to obtain foreign intelligence information not concerning a U.S. Person or to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities, provided that such investigation of a U.S person is not conducted solely on the basis of activities protected by the First Amendment.

But court permission sought to get records and the government has to prove the investigation is to obtain foreign intelligence information and not concerning a U.S. person,… provided that such investigation of a U.S person is not conducted solely on the basis of activities protected by First Amendment.

If these are the provision for investigating terrorism, how is that D.O.G.E can barge into agencies independent or government without adhering to legal provision take over government property or other business records and even get Police and F.B.I to support such criminal acts. Isn’t there a law in US that states destruction of government property is a War Crime, if so, forceful take over and removal of locks or its destruction and replacement, isn’t this a War Crime.

Mr. President of United States, Donald Trump, Mr. Elon Musk and his team are carrying out act of terror, for D.O.G.E is terrorizing professionals in name of assessment or evaluation, it is without giving notice firing people or threatening them, seizing documents, changing the access process, destroying federal services by making it dysfunctional and most of all when people assert their rights and that of their agency, D.O.G.E team are using force amounting to war crimes and acts of terror. They are using measures not even given to law agencies and others even under the Patriot Act, all in the name of evaluation or assessment of Federal Services to detect Fraud and Corruption.

 Molly Charles

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...

The President of US stands accused of Genocidal intent?

Mr.President Trump, after hinting at his intent for days, now allegedly has stated loud and clear he would like to own another sovereign state, Palestine and wants to remove the entire population of Palestinians from there. For which he is bidding with nations in the middle east, almost creating a new form of slave trade.  The President of US standa accused of:  a) Clearly expressed Genocidal intent, expressed to entire world totally in free will, standing in a position of power as the greatest spender on Military industry.  2. As specified in Article two of genocide convention he state he wants to destroy an entire nation by erasing its existence and using organised crime methods for the same.  3.Totally against the UN charter Article 2 (4) for it "prohibits use of force (which could be physical and psychological) and calls on all Members to respect the Sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of other states.  4. Whether US and Israel want...