Skip to main content

New York University protects Genocide and Terrorism, against existing State laws for Domestic Terrorism?


New York University seeks to protect the Zionist ideology which at present assert its right to

a) Bomb civilians, including women and children in Palestine

b) Destroy Public infrastructure including Roads, Mosques, Hospitals, Business places,
Schools, Hospitals, Libraries and Universities (that have been closed for over 11 months).

c) It insists on its right to create terror in Gaza

d) It insists on its right to bomb water sources and water collecting units in Gaza

e) It insists on its right to shoot at children who throw stones at soldiers within heavily armed tanks/vehicles

f) It insists on right to shoot at a child, numerous times, as she is calling for help being shut inside a car she was travelling with only dead body passengers to keep her company

d) It insists on its right to hold an entire group under siege and torment and terrorise the population.

e) It insists on its right to dehumanise Palestinians 

f) It insists on its right to pillage, to plunder, to take children as state hostage in middle of the night.

It seems most of all New York University is insisting that Domestic Terrorism laws for New York, which protects local population from terrorism, can be misconstrued to protect American Citizen with double passports for Israel, even as they conduct all or any one of crimes mentioned above whether by carrying out or aiding or abetting the same in Israel. 

New York, State Domestic Terrorism Act,

Prohibits committing a specified offense with the intent to intimidate a civilian population,

...through murder, assassination or kidnapping. 

A specified offense includes murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, arson, making a terroristic threat, assault, use or possession of a chemical or biological weapon..."

The crime shall be punished by deeming the penalty one felony category higher than the specified offense. If the specified offense is a Class A-I felony than the penalty will be nothing less than life in prison without parole.


Will New York University, also create some exemption in definition of Terrorism and Terrorists based on Jewish identity?






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Living in the Margins

 Molly Charles (1) Margin, a term familiar from tender age; notebooks with clear cut margins to delineate the main body of text, define it. The margins give it definite shape, a practice that continues into the virtual world. Among humans, it is these margins that give identity to the large majority we term normal. The often, porous boundaries offer a chance for individuals to slip through and slip back into either ‘normal’ or ‘marginal’ spaces. The decision to identify with marginal groups or positions can be a conscious one as with (gender identity, drug use), enforced as in (mental health, racial and caste based discrimination) and accidental for (drug use, stigmatized diseases). In certain instances, as with mental health, some individuals may find their being part of marginal groups a permanent reality, in most other instances individuals do move in and out of marginal groups, as a survival strategy to deal with marginalization. Even when physical spaces merge, with an emph...
Post a Comment
Read more

Peace, Security & Fourth Industry, Technology—impact on Us and Our Becoming

                                                                                                                                                   Peace is something everyone can sense, and yet, find difficult to define. Its complexity, and simplicity is reflected in our restricted definition of peace as an absence of war/violence, even though we sense it is far beyond that.    Peace is a concept that exists beyond the boundaries of empirical reality, but we seek it within the realms of empirical reality, where power has the final say. We conceive it as a static state, where a world view palatable to u...
Post a Comment
Read more

Drugs, Altered States of Consciousness & Us - Implications for Drug Policy

                                                             C enturies have gone by and yet we struggle in our waltz with Mind Altering Substances (MAS), our steps still falter and a probable safe distance evades our grasp. The yesteryears centered around finding mind altering substances in nature, from far and near; now we hone our skills in identifying the right chemicals or the means of manipulating molecular formations for creating MAS within kitchen labs or in the pharmaceutical industry. The presence of numerous substances to choose from has apparently not satiated user demand nor dampened the passion of enforcement agencies to exterminate the 'enemy'. There is an ever widening gap in the perception of MAS by users, numerous sub groups within the larger society, inclusive of enforcers of the Law. Users who adhere to cul...
Read more