Molly Charles-Reflections

  Mr. President, Israeli expert conclusion communicated to you and vouched for by you, did not jell, so used the net for some searches. Here are some of my thoughts and doubts based on information available online. a) The shooter was standing at a roof top, at a greater height than the victim standing at ground level in the open space. Hence, the shooter had far better vision than the individuals at ground level and so could clearly see his target or targets. b) According to available information, Israeli forces use IWI Tavor assault rifle or micro Tavor rifles both tested for urban warfare and also tested for use in Palestine. Its accuracy has been vouched for by Israeli forces themselves. The other option could be MS 95R Sniper Rifle. The range for Tavor rifles is 500 meters and for sniper rifle it is 1000 meters. Both have sight magnifier and so whether purely by human sight or along with magnifier the soldier should have no problem in having a clear view of his/her targets. c) Wit

Narrative building is a skill in itself often ignored by audience and at times writers themselves, while editor and opinion builder may get preoccupied with the same. In the absence of logic audience build identities based on these opinions, and forgetting opinions are often grey areas and never permanently static. We the audience, often forget to look out for logic within the opinion, the context within which opinion evolved and the conceived purpose for expression of the opinion. While all nations do spend some time in looking at the opinion formation and try to build it in a specific direction, it can be difficult when there are numerous, cultural, religion, linguistic and lifestyle differences as in the case of India. Earlier diversity was far more expected and within each state the language offered a veil and national government avoided tampering with the veil and put all the expressed opinion under a microscope, for without diversity in opinion knowledge cannot evolve and mi

From the realm of UN and its organs to the western media of all form and sizes, the act injustice to Palestinians starts with the first sentence when you state, “October 7 th 2023 attack by Hamas on Israel led to this war”. Even before a conversation can take form you have made your judgement and hope to shape the narrative of your audience in those lines. Have you ever thought of analysing what you emphatically state: a) Relevance of the first sentence: you introduce a topic, you make you stance clear to lay the foundation for your frame, human mind often catches the start and the end and so you are conditioning your audience with your bias, you ensure an emotional response that you seek to elicit. b) You state the beginning is 7 th October 2023, a fallacy Israel wants to propagate and strengthen, and you ignore: the murders of Palestinians before that, a) you ignore Israel State Hostage Taking of children and their illegal detention without charging for years and at times decade

The concept and term of terror within international debates has been highlighted for its ambiguity and scope for use in different ways. But this instant creates a definitive moment where Terror reign supreme among Palestinians as Israel tries different methods of war and criminal acts on the Palestinian population. An infant bid farewell to this violent world that tortured her with sounds too loud for her heart to endure. She died in her frightened mother’s arms in a matter of seconds, after Israeli bombardment resounded in their place of stay. The devastated mother says “If my daughter had some health issues her passing away would not have devastated me this much. There would have been time to come to terms with her death. But my daughter died from fear, in seconds. She died in my arms in a minute, then they took her away. It all happened in may be 15 minutes”. “From sound of bombardment she got scared. I am her mother, at times, I feel my heart is going to stop”. “With every st

New York University seeks to protect the Zionist ideology which at present assert its right to a) Bomb civilians, including women and children in Palestine b) Destroy Public infrastructure including Roads, Mosques, Hospitals, Business places, Schools, Hospitals, Libraries and Universities (that have been closed for over 11 months). c) It insists on its right to create terror in Gaza d) It insists on its right to bomb water sources and water collecting units in Gaza e) It insists on its right to shoot at children who throw stones at soldiers within heavily armed tanks/vehicles f) It insists on right to shoot at a child, numerous times, as she is calling for help being shut inside a car she was travelling with only dead body passengers to keep her company d) It insists on its right to hold an entire group under siege and torment and terrorise the population. e) It insists on its right to dehumanise Palestinians  f) It insists on its right to pillage, to plunder, to take children as state

  French Cyber Security, never thought a global drug trader, marketer, human trafficker, extortionist, gun trafficker could exist all rolled in one and on one platform and under the control of one individual, along with disinformation, fake news? It is extremely interesting that you have identified Telegram as the central point for global illegal crime activities. Just curious, by your logic all the postal departments across the globe should be held criminally liable, for after all these department have provided some sort of cover for most of the activities and drug trade taking the prime spot. Can we expect a global plan in action to arrest the respective Postal Department heads or the concerned Ministers. This is great! Since, there are differen t laws and different provisions under these laws for carrying out arrest, just curious which law took precedent over all else. Since, you have identified Telegram as the main culprit, you should inform UNODC for they are under the vag

WHO states on its site about its values “We are Professionals committed to integrity and excellence in health with a spirit of collaboration and a steadfast commitment to science, we are trusted to care for world’s health. Just curious, WHO is committed to Science but not humanity, is that why you see no issues of criminality and anti-humanity when you do directly and indirectly support Israel has the right to continue its slaughter after three days of ceasefire. WHO's values include to ensure all people attain the highest possible health, what health do Palestinian Children hope for when the world and internation organs of governance have sanctioned through silence their death by air strike, sniper shots, bombs, shrapnel, starvation and many other communicable diseases which unless Israel stops its siege and opens the illegal occupation of border to Gaza. WHO states it adheres to UN Values of integrity, seriously? What kind of integrity are WHO and UN referring to when it thr

  While killing and mayhem is associated with acts of Terror, West seems to be stuck at 7the October 2023, for nothing prior or past seems to register in the mindset of US President Joe Biden or reflect in his Hitlerian Presidential Executive Orders regarding military aid to Israel and the same line of thought but with a different shade is trending among German Politicians who can’t get beyond their historical guilt so much so their Raison D’etre is to assert Israel’ s right even as it commits war crimes and genocide across Gaza strip. All the world has delivered as they watch Israel display with pride their act of crime is express their concern, abhorrence, anger, all the words mean nothing to Israel which assumes impunity is its birthright. Israel gloats over its right to carry out war crimes and challenges the world with total confidence in their complete impunity as United States and Germany and others offer diplomatic cover and veto power. The only variation is that a handful of

  France sits at UN Security Council, Claims to be a Social Republic and a Democracy and yet except for certain words, France has yet to act against Genocide carried out by Israel, or even to acknowledge Genocide is being carried out.  Yet, France is so prompt to arrest the Telegram CEO for documents leaked, documents of a Genocidal State Israel, whose leaders blatantly carryout acts of Anti humanity, come to the Security Council act in total impunity and yet France like the rest of the Western World is silent, in fact they might bend over to accommodate Israel. Why is Israel protected by the West: a)  Israel is carrying out action research or experimentation of various military equipment and there is no other place other than Palestine, as it is totally under Tech Siege by Israel, to carry out these experiments. Is that the reason western countries like US, Germany, UK and France are willing to go all out for Genocidal Israel b) Isn't there a need for criminal investigation on the

  United States as the mediator between Israel and Hamas, brings to question what is the role of the mediator, and the basic norms to be adhered to when being the mediator. According to United Nations, International law and US law there are certain common basic elements for being a mediator, it may be useful to briefly address the same. Basic definition is stated to be “Mediation in a voluntary, binding process in which an impartial and neutral mediator facilitates disputing parties in reaching a settlement.” Basic requirements: According to United Nations Guidance for Effective Mediation, Impartiality is the corner stone of mediation, a mediator should be able to run a balanced process that treats all actors fairly and “Should not have a material interest in the outcome”. While UN document does indicate impartiality does not mean neutrality, as a UN mediator he/she is mandated to uphold certain universal principles and values and may need to make them explicitly known to the part

  The definition of democracy has changed, for Israel and US Genocide is an option within democracy to obliterate the Palestinian as Israel occupies them. Yes, US would prefer not to use the word Genocide but the actions of Israel that lead to the conclusion Genocide, is very rarely even questioned by US. Now, Israel asserts it has right over Philadelphi crossing, thought legally it has none. It is demanding the right of occupation all over again. Would any other democracy think making such outlandish assertion and would others even lend an ear, No! But US is not just providing political cover for Israel in UN it is also ensuring its illegal and criminal demands are brought up for debate. Why, Israel you need time to test jet F 15 or some tank for further action research. It is time the Countries in the area came together and assert "Law matters and Genocide is unacceptable, through their action". Israel's and America's need for tech based military equipment testing

  War or Conflict is not just about resource control, identity supremacy or even land control it can also be carrying on business in the evolving tech based military industry; or it can be multiple factors acting in combination based on actors involved. The onslaught of Israel on Gaza is linked to desire to depopulate the place and ensure Greater Israel and in the process achieve also the goal of annihilation of an ethnic religious group, Israelis have an inherent hatred towards and for which they believe they have religious justifications which even sanctifies war crimes or genocide carried out against Palestinians. It is an issue about Israeli society as a whole, how it evolved and what it assumed its existential goal is – to recreate past called Greater Israel. The skewed mentality of assuming Israelis have the right to depopulate Palestine, is not linked to one party or a few individuals it is the raison d’etre of almost entire population. There is one question to the great vision