Molly Charles-Reflections

  The President of US, Trump, has declared often that he lives by his understanding of values and morality and not as per domestic and international. Which is fine as an individual, but is it fine for a President of a country, that has to be decided by the Americans, the US Congress and that still makes it a domestic matter. But, when the President of US threatens other countries and thinks he has the freedom to break international law to do so; then it is a matter to be decided upon by the international communities and other UN member states or other countries. Then the question to be answered, Isn’t the US President accountable for using force or threatening to use force to make Iran to adhere to US terms and recommendation against Iran’s will and sovereign rights. Mr. President, here below are instance of you declaring and communicating your threats, based on willingness to use force along with clear examples of you willing to fall through with your plans, be it bombing school...

  The reality of Western Hemisphere and its regional governance are a clear example of fact that the US makes a mockery of nations sovereignty and how it can set wedges and thereby ensure isolation of   countries within a region and at the same time keep an American stranglehold over the region. While the US is solely responsible for the mess it created in the Western Hemisphere, here in the Middle East it is trying to take on the same role, except it has Israel as the go between. Be careful, Iran and Lebanon, never trust any document given by the US read between the lines! I may be naïve on international matters, but can read between the lines. The United States is taking the whole world for a ride, it is not seeking peace it is seeking total control over the region, it is using so called “Israel’s Security” and the US own disguised claims of national security.   It is strange, even after having become the greatest military power the US has no shame in blindsiding ot...

  Sanctions were meant to act at deterrence but it has been used by the US more than any other country to maintain its stronghold on nations and assert its right to impunity and ensure the international community understands the US is above the law, this has been subtle till President Trump took office this term. Under President Trump, the only international relations that US has practiced is to assert it is a Rogue State and US President is asserting his right to be Rogue with legal liability. If the international community had called his bluff, when he first invaded Iran and dropped bombs on Nuclear facility in Iran with the claim that presence of enriched Uranium 65 Percent meant Iran is making nuclear war heads. No one bother to call out the blatant lie, the plan to use logical fallacy to control international narrative, for if Iran really wanted to have nuclear warhead, it could have just done what India, Pakistan, or North Korea did, which is to enrich uranium in silence an...

 Mr. President, you tried your best and failed, you should have left it at that instead you gave an outlandish explanation for your creativity, a visual self-representation. Since, the tech world is silent and your lies have created confusion about your intention, it is time to make it crystal clear that you are lying. Mr. President the image below is AI generated, and AI does not produce an image without a request for the same. It is not sufficient to request for a visual, you have to guide it through prompt or textual description. Your post (given below for reference) clearly indicates that the AI did not receive any prompt or textual guidance that you wished to represent yourself as a doctor.   Mr. President, please don’t bother to state that AI assumed a doctor is represented as the image given. Mr. President, health care industry in 2024-2025 was worth over 11 trillion, and they would take definition of terms and the representation of the specific terms very serious...

  According to Rome Statute Art 31, Grounds for excluding criminal responsibility, Article 31 (1) (a), a person is not criminally responsible if, at the time of their conduct, the person suffers from a mental disease or defect that destroys that person’s capacity to appreciate the unlawfulness or nature of his or her conduct, or capacity to control his or her conduct to conform to the requirement of law [1]. If the idea is to exempt the US President from acts of War Crimes and Acts of Terror that he himself declares online that he has carried out using Rome Statue Art 31 or similar domestic legal provisions, then wouldn’t the US Congress be criminally liable for not restraining him even when he was clearly carrying out war crimes across countries without legal sanction for these criminal attacks. The question that remains unaddressed, isn’t the US Congress criminally liable for the acts of the US President as they in spite of clear evidence from his self-declared explanation, r...

  The illusion - American Democracy                                                  The World has seen many wars being fought against Nations across the globe by the United States under different US Presidents, the claim always being that the US was going to bring democratic governance to these sovereign countries and ensure freedom for people from the outside. No one asked what right the US had as but another country among 159 nations to invade another country in the name of misgovernance, an internal sovereign matter on the basis of US perception or perception of American Diaspora from different countries or more realistically on basis of the Perception of American companies and their need for natural resources. The United States has been having a free ride on global governance, with total disregard for laws both domestic and international. Recent even...